Skip to main content
· 1/27/2011

United States v. Tchibassa

Citations

  • 762 F. Supp. 2d 3
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9528
  • 2011 WL 304657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Regardless of how a pro se prisoner styles his motion, a court must review the motion based on its substance.” (quoting United States v. Akers, 519 F. Supp. 2d 94, 95 (D.D.C. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas F. Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.