· 1/27/2011
United States v. Tchibassa
Citations
- 762 F. Supp. 2d 3
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9528
- 2011 WL 304657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Regardless of how a pro se prisoner styles his motion, a court must review the motion based on its substance.” (quoting United States v. Akers, 519 F. Supp. 2d 94, 95 (D.D.C. 2007))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas F. Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.