United States v. Tayman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]t is not difficult for the government to write plea agreements that explicitly waive both appeal and § 2255 rights.”
• holding Teague applicable to new statutory rules but declining to apply on other grounds
• agreeing with the government that “the line separating procedure and substance is not always a bright one”
• Supreme Court yet to apply first Teague exception to substantive law, but has not yet had occasion to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).