· 3/9/1916
United States v. Tappenbeck
Citations
- 7 Ct. Cust. 17
- 1916 WL 21553
- 1916 CCPA LEXIS 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The district court need not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.” (citing Koerner v. Grigas, 328 F.3d 1039, 1048 (9th Cir. 2003). Accord Mitchell v. United 28 States, 971 F.3d 1081, 1084 n.4 (9th Cir. 2020
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baebee, Barber, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Yries
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.