United States v. Tapia-Mendoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is “doubtful” that an individual has standing, but declining to decide the issue conclusively
• expressing doubt that Article 36 confers individual rights, but declining to reach issue because defendant’s claim failed for other reasons
• imposing a \requirement that actual prejudice resulting from the alleged violation must be shown before obtaining a remedy\
• expressing doubt that Article 36 confers individual rights, but declining to reach issue because defendant's claim failed for other reasons
• “This court ... rules that the remedy of suppression is not available under the Vienna Convention”
• it is \doubtful\ that an individual has standing, but declining to decide the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).