United States v. Tanya Mann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, even when the Government relies on an aiding and abetting theory, it “must prove that someone committed the underlying crime”
• conviction for aiding and abetting possession of \device-making equipment\ reversed because instruction omitted fraudulent intent element required for conviction on the underlying charge
• jury instruction improperly allowed jury to convict defendant without first determining that principal committed underlying offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).