United States v. Tamara Rae Shinder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s flight prior to sentencing was “sufficient ground” both to apply obstruction-of-justice enhancement and to deny acceptance-of- responsibility reduction
• holding § 3C1.1 enhancement proper where defendant fled to California after conviction and prior to sentencing
• absconding while on 10 presentencing release justifies denial of reduction and imposition of enhancement
• defendant’s flight prior to 1 The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- sentencing was “sufficient ground” both to apply obstruction enhancement and to deny acceptance reduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).