United States v. Talley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants could not rely on defense of mutually antagonistic defenses in light of Zafiro because the government had met its burden of proof
• holding that defendants could not rely on defense of mutually antagonistic defenses in light of Zafiro because the government had met its burden of proof
• concluding that information- provided by a confidential informant “when combined with independent corroboration by the police” can rise to the level of probable cause under the totality of the circumstances
• “[Limiting instructions often will suffice to cure any risk of prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).