United States v. Szymuszkiewicz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the copies were sent contemporaneously with the original e-mails, the defendant had intercepted the communications and could be held liable
• holding defendant had intercepted communications when copies of e-mails were sent contemporaneously with the original e-mail
• indicating that the Federal Wiretap Act does not have a timing requirement
• indicating that the Federal Wiretap Act does not have a timing requirement
• indicating that the Federal Wiretap Act does not have a timing requirement
• indicating that the Federal Wiretap Act does not have a timing requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).