Skip to main content
· 7/31/2012

United States v. Symonevich

Citations

  • 688 F.3d 12
  • 2012 WL 3083491
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is no error where the requested instruction is “substantially incorporated into the charge as rendered”
  • stating the FDCPA does not prohibit “bizarre or unreasonable” 17 interpretations of a collection notice
  • \An error mandates reversal only when it is prejudicial based on a review of the entire record.\
  • \Evidence . . . is not unfairly prejudicial merely because it is harmful to the defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Souter, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.