Skip to main content
· 2/21/1985

United States v. Sylvester Anthony Domme, Jr. And Thomas Allen Domme

Citations

  • 753 F.2d 950
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Sjtaleness is an issue that courts must decide by evaluating the facts of a particular case.”
  • “When criminal activity is protracted and continuous, it is more likely that the passage of time will not dissipate probable cause.”
  • “When criminal activity is protracted and continuous, it is more likely that the passage of time will not dissipate probable cause.”
  • “As with 18 other types of search warrants, the probable cause needed to obtain a wiretap must exist at the time surveillance is authorized”
  • \[S]taleness is an issue that courts must decide by evaluating the facts of a particular case.\
  • “A wiretap application need not provide probable cause of criminal ac- tivity for each person named in an application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Anderson, Atkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.