United States v. Swett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that judicial estoppel precludes a party from asserting a position “that is inconsistent with a position taken by that party in a previous judicial proceeding.
• explaining the circumstances under which courts applying Virgin Islands law must conduct a Banks analysis
• “[A] demand for punitive damages ... is not a cause of action”
• noting trial slated for March 2017

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).