United States v. Sweat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that three months after the jury had been dismissed, reassembly implicated “inherent concerns about recalling and interrogating jurors, plus the likely fogging of memories with the passage of time from the end of the trial”
• concluding that three months after the jury had been 296 HARRISON v. GILLESPIE dismissed, reassembly implicated “inherent concerns about recalling and interrogating jurors, plus the likely fogging of memories with the passage of time from the end of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).