United States v. Swafford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing a ““wheel conspiracy’ (or ‘hug-and-spoke’ conspiracy)—wherein the defendant served as the hub connected to each of the customers via a spoke... .”
• finding a “‘wheel conspiracy’ (or ‘hub-and-spoke’ conspiracy)—wherein the defendant served as the hub connected to each of the customers via a spoke . . . — fails because no common goal or enterprise existed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).