Customs and Patent Appeals· 5/23/1916
United States v. Sussfeld
Citations
- 7 Ct. Cust. 126
- 1916 WL 21528
- 1916 CCPA LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that city may properly be held liable where policy is moving force behind constitutional violation
- holding that the liability of Los Angeles for a police dog bite was separate from the officer's qualified immunity defense
- holding that “severe” force was used to apprehend plaintiff where dog was taught to seize suspects by biting and holding and plaintiff sustained “serious lacerations”
- holding that force was 18 “severe” when the dog bit the subject three times and dragged him several feet
- holding that the reasonableness of the use a police dog is for the jury where, among other things, the suspect was non-violent, completely surrounded and hiding
- holding that the use of a police dog was a “severe” use of force
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barber, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Vries
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.