Skip to main content

United States v. Sussfeld

Citations

  • 7 Ct. Cust. 126
  • 1916 WL 21528
  • 1916 CCPA LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that city may properly be held liable where policy is moving force behind constitutional violation
  • holding that the liability of Los Angeles for a police dog bite was separate from the officer's qualified immunity defense
  • holding that “severe” force was used to apprehend plaintiff where dog was taught to seize suspects by biting and holding and plaintiff sustained “serious lacerations”
  • holding that force was 18 “severe” when the dog bit the subject three times and dragged him several feet
  • holding that the reasonableness of the use a police dog is for the jury where, among other things, the suspect was non-violent, completely surrounded and hiding
  • holding that the use of a police dog was a “severe” use of force

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barber, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Vries

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.