Skip to main content
· 5/6/1996

United States v. Suntip Company, United States of America v. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc.

Citations

  • 82 F.3d 1468
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3157
  • 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,925
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 5198
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1367
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10254
  • 1996 WL 224493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an action in the Court of Federal Claims is an “administrative proceeding,” in part because the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982 changed the CFC from an Article III to an Article I court
  • an action to enforce a contracting officer’s decision does not accrue until the officer issues the decision
  • government must seek relief at agency level within six years after claim accrues but thereafter is allowed one year from final agency action to seek enforcement of agency decision in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Reinhardt, Noonan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.