United States v. Suntar Roofing, Inc. And David Kevin Pratt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding per se unlawful “an agreement to allocate or divide customers between competitors within the same horizontal market” (emphasis added)
• “[S]o long as the charge as a whole adequately states the law, the refusal to give a particular requested instruction is not an abuse of discretion.”
• prior representation of witness did not present an actual conflict of interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).