United States v. Sunday Obialo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The question before us is whether there was substantial evidence upon which a reasonable jury could have based its verdict.”
• “The failure of the government to be able to name and personally identify the other conspirator is not fatal to a conspiracy conviction.”
• “In considering [defendant’s] argument that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction on the conspiracy charge, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the [Government as the verdict winner.”
• “In considering [defendant’s] argument that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction on the conspiracy charge, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the [G]ovemment as the verdict winner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).