Skip to main content
· 5/23/2000

United States v. Sun Growers of CA

Citations

  • 212 F.3d 603
  • 341 U.S. App. D.C. 273
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11396
  • 2000 WL 562822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant whose conviction is vacated is not entitled to interest on the funds he paid, but implying that a district court has the authority to order that the government refund him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Henderson, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.