· 5/23/2000
United States v. Sun Growers of CA
Citations
- 212 F.3d 603
- 341 U.S. App. D.C. 273
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11396
- 2000 WL 562822
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant whose conviction is vacated is not entitled to interest on the funds he paid, but implying that a district court has the authority to order that the government refund him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Henderson, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.