Skip to main content
· 6/7/2006

United States v. Sue Ellen Staten

Citations

  • 450 F.3d 384
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13955
  • 2006 WL 1542835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting Dupas analy- sis to reject identical due process argument reviewed as “traditional ex post facto argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould, Berzon, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.