United States v. Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of complaint that was “argumentative, prolix, 5 replete with redundancy, and largely irrelevant”
• affirming dismissal of complaint that was “argumentative, prolix, 5 replete with redundancy, and largely irrelevant”
• affirming dismissal of a complaint under Rule 8 that was 6 “argumentative, prolix, replete with redundancy, and largely irrelevant”
• upholding Rule 8(a) dismissal of complaint that was 6 “argumentative, prolix, replete with redundancy, and largely irrelevant”
• “The test is whether the government exercised coercive power or provided such significant encouragement that the complained-of misconduct . . . must be deemed to be the conduct of the government.”
• \an amicus cannot introduce a new argument into a case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).