Skip to main content
· 5/14/1992

United States v. Stuart Ziglin

Citations

  • 964 F.2d 756
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10374
  • 1992 WL 98396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant subject to enhancement for the total amount of improper benefit that resulted from bribery scheme, not merely for his individual share
  • improper benefit was amount accruing to defendant as well as his two co-conspirators
  • proper to count prior offense of exhibiting deadly weapon in threatening manner where offense was not on exclusionary list of § 4A1.2(c)(1) or (c)(2) and was not similar to such listed offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Bowman, Eisele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.