United States v. Straitiff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “finding that ... joinder is impracticable” is not inconsistent with a finding that plaintiff “failed to demonstrate [superiority]”; this assertion “would effectively vitiate any meaningful distinction between the numerosity' requirement and the superiority requirement”
• “finding that... joinder is impracticable” is not inconsistent with a finding that plaintiff “failed to demonstrate [superiority]”; this assertion “would effectively vitiate any meaningful distinction between the numerosity requirement and the superiority requirement”
• “finding that... joinder is impracticable” is not inconsistent with a finding that plaintiff “failed to demonstrate [superiority]”; this assertion “would effectively vitiate any meaningful distinction between the numerosity requirement and the superiority requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).