· 5/4/2010
United States v. Stever
Citations
- 603 F.3d 747
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9141
- 2010 WL 1757926
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the exclusion of evidence denied “a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense” because Stever was entirely precluded from offering his desired defense
- excluded evidence that Mexican drug trafficking organizations had a practice of trespassing on farmland and planting marijuana
- “A violation of the right to present a defense requires reversal of a guilty verdict unless the Government convinces us that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
- “[T]he district court is not free to dismiss logically relevant evidence as speculative.”
- discovery rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farris, Nelson, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.