Skip to main content
· 5/4/2010

United States v. Stever

Citations

  • 603 F.3d 747
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9141
  • 2010 WL 1757926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the exclusion of evidence denied “a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense” because Stever was entirely precluded from offering his desired defense
  • excluded evidence that Mexican drug trafficking organizations had a practice of trespassing on farmland and planting marijuana
  • “A violation of the right to present a defense requires reversal of a guilty verdict unless the Government convinces us that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • “[T]he district court is not free to dismiss logically relevant evidence as speculative.”
  • discovery rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farris, Nelson, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.