Skip to main content
· 2/23/1999

United States v. Steven Sylvester Tucker

Citations

  • 169 F.3d 1115
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804
  • 1999 WL 89331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unless it is incredible or insubstantial on its face, accomplice testimony is sufficient to support conviction, and trial court is not obliged to instruct jury to consider uncorroborated accomplice testimony with caution
  • unless it is incredible or insubstantial on its face, accomplice testimony is sufficient to support conviction, and trial court is not obliged to instruct jury to consider uncorroborated accomplice testimony with caution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.