Eighth Circuit· 5/20/2013
United States v. Steven Sullivan
Citations
- 714 F.3d 1104
- 2013 WL 2149910
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10030
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a defendant’s knowledge that “bath powder” was illegal supported a reasonable inference that he knew powder he possessed and described as “bath powder” contained a controlled substance analogue
- affirming a conviction for distributing a controlled substance analogue, even though the label on the analogue said not to ingest it, because other evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant intended the analogue for human consumption
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Earl RamosEighth Circuit· 2016-02-09· cited 32×
- United States v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 2014-04-15· cited 19×
- United States v. Lorena MoralesEighth Circuit· 2016-02-10· cited 17×
- United States v. Gabriel Garcia-HernandezEighth Circuit· 2015-10-16· cited 15×
- United States v. Charles ChastainEighth Circuit· 2020-10-28· cited 9×
- United States v. Eli EricksonEighth Circuit· 2021-06-02· cited 9×
- United States v. Marques SmithEighth Circuit· 2021-07-20· cited 3×
- United States v. LongD. South Dakota· 2014-04-25· cited 1×
- United States v. Tracy ClemonsEighth Circuit· 2013-07-22
- United States v. Jerome JohnsonEighth Circuit· 2014-02-13
- United States v. GrossS.D. Alabama· 2014-11-20
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Wicahpe George MilkEighth Circuit· 2006-05-12· cited 76×
- United States v. WiestEighth Circuit· 2010-03-04· cited 68×
- United States v. Thomas William WashamEighth Circuit· 2003-01-14· cited 52×
- United States v. Van NguyenEighth Circuit· 2010-04-02· cited 50×
- United States v. Sedighe Honarvar, United States of America v. Rahim ZamanianEighth Circuit· 2007-02-26· cited 39×
- United States v. Vincente Espinoza, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 2012-07-13· cited 32×
- United States v. Michael WellsEighth Circuit· 2013-02-14· cited 17×
- United States v. YangEighth Circuit· 2010-05-10· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.