United States v. Steven Michael Kalish, (Two Cases.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that we do not consider, on collateral review, issues that were previously raised and decided on direct appeal
• “[I]ssues raised and disposed of in a previous appeal from an original judgment of conviction are not considered in § 2255 [m]otions.”
• issue raised and rejected on direct appeal may not be presented in a subsequent § 2255 proceeding
• issues raised and disposed of in a previous appeal are not considered under § 2255
• “[I]ssues raised and disposed of in a previous appeal from an original judgment of conviction are not considered in § 2255 [m]otions.”
• \It is settled in this Circuit that issues raised and disposed of in a previous appeal from an original judgment of conviction are not considered in § 2255 [m]otions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).