United States v. Steven Lynn Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “testimony as to a company’s routine use of the postal service is sufficient evidence on its own to establish the mailing requirement”
• stating “testimony as to a company’s routine use of the postal service is sufficient evidence on its own to establish the mailing requirement”
• discussing the holding in Regis v. Holder, 769 F.3d 878, 884 18 (4th Cir. 2014) (discussing the holding in Matter of Le and its impact on the K-1 and K-2 19 nonimmigrant process upon judicial review
• the ALJ’s credibility findings “must be sufficiently 18 specific to allow a reviewing court to conclude the [ALJ] rejected [the] claimant’s 19 testimony on permissible grounds and did not arbitrarily discredit the claimant’s 20 testimony”
• “‘[i]t has sentencing court shall increase the base offense level for long been recognized ... that circumstantial evidence ... can be money laundering depending on the amount of loss involved. sufficient to support a jury’s determination...’”
• limiting Johnson to its facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).