Skip to main content
· 8/15/2003

United States v. Steven Jay Radmall

Citations

  • 340 F.3d 798
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9253
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7377
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16726
  • 2003 WL 21947140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Defendant] cannot now use the serendipitous fact of reversal . . . to refashion his defaulted claims. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Kleinfeld, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.