Skip to main content
· 7/31/1989

United States v. Steven Ernest Hester

Citations

  • 880 F.2d 799
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017
  • 1989 WL 83849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “knowingly” does not require proof of “‘actual’ or ‘positive’ knowledge”
  • finding sufficient evidence where jury could have inferred knowledge from “sufficiently strong” circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Phillips, Murnaghan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.