· 7/31/1989
United States v. Steven Ernest Hester
Citations
- 880 F.2d 799
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017
- 1989 WL 83849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “knowingly” does not require proof of “‘actual’ or ‘positive’ knowledge”
- finding sufficient evidence where jury could have inferred knowledge from “sufficiently strong” circumstantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Phillips, Murnaghan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.