United States v. Steven Boitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that three-judge panel may not overrule a prior panel opinion absent clearly irreconcilable, intervening higher authority
• recognizing that three-judge panel may not overrule a prior panel opinion absent clearly irreconcilable, intervening higher authority
• “[A]s a three-judge panel we are bound by prior panel opinions . . . .”
• “[A]s a three-judge panel we are bound by prior panel opinions and can only reexamine them when the reasoning or theory of our prior circuit authority is clearly irreconcilable with the reasoning or theory of intervening higher authority.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A]s a three-judge panel we are bound by prior panel opinions and can only reexamine them when the reasoning or theory of our prior circuit authority is clearly irreconcilable with the reasoning or theory of intervening higher authority.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• circuit precedent reversible only en banc

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).