United States v. Steven B. Zackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where a defendant is on notice of the essential facts that would allow him to take advantage of exculpatory evidence, that evidence is beyond the purview of Brady
• explaining that frivolousness dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) are reviewed de novo
• remanding for an adequate statement of reasons where the sentencing judge’s explanation was simply “I have considered everything”
• remanding for an adequate statement of reasons where the sentencing judge’s explanation was simply “I have considered everything”
• remanding for an adequate statement of reasons where the sentencing judge’s explanation was simply “I have considered everything”
• remanding for resentencing when the district court failed to articulate any reason at all for why a particular sentence was selected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).