United States v. Steve Richard Frondle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court was entitled to attribute at least two kilograms of cocaine to defendant based on coconspirator's statement that he fronted defendant \between two and four kilograms\ in \June or July of 1987\
• error in attribution of drug quantity harmless when underlying base offense level would not change
• district court is entitled to credit witnesses& testimony at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).