United States v. Stephen Robert Gunning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 7 | district court shall not delegate its responsibility of fixing the terms for making restitution
• holding that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act 3 of 1996 requires the sentencing court to set the terms of restitution payments, which is a duty that 4 may not be delegated
• remanding because the district court assigned “full control” of the restitution payment schedule to a probation officer
• remanding because the district court assigned “full control” of the restitution payment schedule to a probation officer
• “The language of the MVRA is categorical.”
• “The language of the MVRA is categorical.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).