United States v. Stephen H. London

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the misrepresentations were directed to the quality or adequacy of the goods, fraudulent intent was apparent and it was \irrelevant whether or not appellant believed that the contracts [in a commodities fraud scheme] were being covered\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).