Skip to main content
· 1/23/1996

United States v. Stephen Charles Barrett

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 167
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 744
  • 1996 WL 21040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony of three alleged co-conspirators was enough to convict defendant of conspiracy even where there was contradictory testimony and no physical evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Gibson, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.