Eighth Circuit· 4/18/2002
United States v. Stephen B. Teeple
Citations
- 286 F.3d 1047
- 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 653
- 89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2102
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7107
- 2002 WL 575711
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the “act of production doctrine” and holding that it does not apply if the existence of incriminating documents is “a foregone conclusion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bye, Heaney, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.