United States v. Stennis-Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Guidelines did not entitle Defendant to have the money she returned credited against the amount of loss for purposes of calculating her offense level,” because return of the money did not diminish her culpability for the original theft
• affirming $238,340 in fraud loss and only $56,134 in restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).