Skip to main content
· 12/29/2010

United States v. Stefan

Citations

  • 69 M.J. 256
  • 2010 CAAF LEXIS 1075
  • 2010 WL 5462977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
  • considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
  • considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
  • considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
  • considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
  • considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stucky, Effron, Baker, Erdmann, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.