· 12/29/2010
United States v. Stefan
Citations
- 69 M.J. 256
- 2010 CAAF LEXIS 1075
- 2010 WL 5462977
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
- considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
- considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
- considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
- considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
- considering de novo the qualification of a staff judge advocate to make the post-trial recommendation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stucky, Effron, Baker, Erdmann, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.