United States v. Steel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e reversed that conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because, although the evidence was sufficient to convict [defendant] on Count One . . . the jury had improperly received an Allen charge.” (emphasis added) (citing Williams, 547 F.3d at 1195–97, 1206–07)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).