Skip to main content
· 1/16/1978

United States v. State of South Carolina

Citations

  • 445 F. Supp. 1094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the South Carolina State Retirement System is an arm of the State
  • holding that the South Carolina State Retirement System is an arm of the State
  • finding without analysis that retirement system is an arm of the state
  • claims based on the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, et seq., barred with respect to the state
  • claims based on the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, et seq., barred with respect to the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haynsworth, Russell, Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.