· 1/16/1978
United States v. State of South Carolina
Citations
- 445 F. Supp. 1094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the South Carolina State Retirement System is an arm of the State
- holding that the South Carolina State Retirement System is an arm of the State
- finding without analysis that retirement system is an arm of the state
- claims based on the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, et seq., barred with respect to the state
- claims based on the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, et seq., barred with respect to the state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haynsworth, Russell, Simons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.