· 5/16/1991
United States v. State of California and California State Board of Equalization
Citations
- 932 F.2d 1346
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 5720
- 37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,098
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3559
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9771
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Ninth Circuit recognizes that the 15 16 legal effect of a dismissal without prejudice is “as though the action[] had never been 17 filed”
- “At the heart of an action based on quasi-contract lies a claim of unjust enrichment and such quasi-contract liability is dictated by the needs of justice and fairness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Hatter, Poole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.