United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding similar contractual language ambiguous and construing 8 the provision in favor of the insured to only apply to the assumption of a third 9 party’s liability
• “[T]he Nevada Supreme Court would hold that faulty workmanship itself does not fall under the common meaning of accident, and 22 there is not an occurrence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).