· 1/6/1964
United States v. Stapf
Citations
- 375 U.S. 118
- 84 S. Ct. 248
- 11 L. Ed. 2d 195
- 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he primary thrust ... is to extend to taxpayers in common law states the advantages of ‘estate splitting’ otherwise available only in community property states.”
- \[T]he primary thrust ... is to extend to taxpayers in common law states the advantages of 'estate splitting' otherwise available only in community property states.\
- A deduction for a claim against an estate “should not be predicated solely on the finding that a promise or claim is legally enforceable under the state laws governing the validity of contracts and wills.”
- A deduction for a claim against an estate \should not be predicated solely on the finding that a promise or claim is legally enforceable under the state laws governing the validity of contracts and wills.\
- interpreting corresponding provision in 1939 Code
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.