Skip to main content
· 1/6/1964

United States v. Stapf

Citations

  • 375 U.S. 118
  • 84 S. Ct. 248
  • 11 L. Ed. 2d 195
  • 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he primary thrust ... is to extend to taxpayers in common law states the advantages of ‘estate splitting’ otherwise available only in community property states.”
  • \[T]he primary thrust ... is to extend to taxpayers in common law states the advantages of 'estate splitting' otherwise available only in community property states.\
  • A deduction for a claim against an estate “should not be predicated solely on the finding that a promise or claim is legally enforceable under the state laws governing the validity of contracts and wills.”
  • A deduction for a claim against an estate \should not be predicated solely on the finding that a promise or claim is legally enforceable under the state laws governing the validity of contracts and wills.\
  • interpreting corresponding provision in 1939 Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.