Supreme Court· 1/6/1964
United States v. Stapf
Citations
- 375 U.S. 118
- 84 S. Ct. 248
- 11 L. Ed. 2d 195
- 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he primary thrust ... is to extend to taxpayers in common law states the advantages of ‘estate splitting’ otherwise available only in community property states.”
- \[T]he primary thrust ... is to extend to taxpayers in common law states the advantages of 'estate splitting' otherwise available only in community property states.\
- A deduction for a claim against an estate “should not be predicated solely on the finding that a promise or claim is legally enforceable under the state laws governing the validity of contracts and wills.”
- A deduction for a claim against an estate \should not be predicated solely on the finding that a promise or claim is legally enforceable under the state laws governing the validity of contracts and wills.\
- interpreting corresponding provision in 1939 Code
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 135×
- Estate of David Smith, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 1975-02-04· cited 107×
- Todd v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1971-11-29· cited 57×
- Northeastern Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 54×
- Estate of Milton S. Wycoff, Deceased, Zions First National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFirst Circuit· 1974-11-19· cited 39×
- Bank of New York v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1975-11-04· cited 35×
- Adele H. Dodd and William A. Dodd, Executors of the Estate of John A. Dodd, Deceased v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1965-06-22· cited 30×
- Estate of Belcher v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1984-08-16· cited 29×
- Estate of Shelfer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueEleventh Circuit· 1996-07-01· cited 27×
- Commissioner v. Estate of HubertSupreme Court· 1997-03-18· cited 26×
- Estate of Shapiro v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2011-02-22· cited 26×
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-08-25· cited 26×
- Estate of Sol Schildkraut, Deceased, Eugene Schildkraut and Lester Schildkraut, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 1966-10-27· cited 23×
- The Hibernia Bank, Administrator With the Will Annexed of the Estate of Celia Tobin Clark, Deceased v. The United States of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1978-08-31· cited 22×
- Tiffany v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1967-02-20· cited 20×
- Estate of Wycoff v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1973-02-01· cited 20×
- Estate of Posen v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1980-12-10· cited 19×
- Beatrice Smither Parson, of the Will and Estate of George W. Parson v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 18×
- Estate of Fannie Alperstein, Deceased, Rosalind A. Greenberg, Administratrix v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 1979-12-07· cited 18×
- The Union Commerce Bank, Transferee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSixth Circuit· 1964-12-14· cited 17×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 812×
- Commissioner v. WemyssSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 261×
- Town of Flagstaff v. WalshNinth Circuit· 1925-11-23· cited 13×
- Stapf v. United StatesN.D. Texas· 1960-08-08· cited 7×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1962-09-26· cited 1×
Other cases named United States v. Stapf
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.