United States v. Stanley Simon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff news agencies' \right to receive speech does not enlarge the rights of those directly subject to the [challenged] restraining order\
• requiring that “each [alternative measure] must be explored and ultimately rejected as inadequate — individually and in combination— as a remedy for prejudicial pretrial publicity before a restraining order [on the press] is entered”
• discussing the existence of a willing speaker to show that the news agencies had standing to challenge a confidentiality order
• affirming gag order that excepted statements of fact concerning trial events from prohibition on prosecutors’ statements to the media
• discussing the existence of a willing speaker to show that the news agencies had standing to challenge a confidentiality order
• “ ‘[Wlhere a willing speaker exists, ... the protection afforded is to the communication, to its source and its recipients both.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).