United States v. Stanley Plesinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, even though the Special Assistant U.S. Attorney’s appointment was invalid, his “unauthorized appearance on behalf of the government did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction over the criminal proceedings”
• rejecting argument that failure to readminister an oath to a Special United States Attorney before his reappointment vitiated any authorization he may have had to conduct criminal proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).