United States v. Stanley M. Pace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court had discretion to consider defendant’s subsequent marijuana use in declining to grant a § 3E1.1 reduction
• holding that the district court did not err in denying an acceptance- of-responsibility reduction based on marijuana use while on bond, even if unrelated to the offense of conviction
• rejecting defendant’s argument that district court erred in denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsi- bility based on his marijuana use because the drug use was “unre- lated to his offense of conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).