United States v. Stanley Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “if the defendant’s intelligent awareness can be reasonably inferred from the transcript or the custom and practice of the court, the plea passes constitutional muster”
• stating that “if the defendant’s intelligent awareness can be reasonably inferred from the transcript or the custom and practice of the court, the plea passes constitutional muster”
• stating that A if the defendant = s intelligent awareness can be reasonably inferred from the transcript or the custom and practice of the court, the plea passes constitutional muster @
• failure to mention privilege against self-incrimination was not fatal where other questions by the court established defendant's understanding
• defendant's allegation that he met with his public defender for only ten to fifteen minutes before he pleaded guilty was insufficient to overcome presumption of reasonable assistance
• “defendant’s intelligent awareness” of constitutional rights “ can be reasonably inferred from the transcript”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).