United States v. Stanislaw Koziel and Andrzej Fiedor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, after repeal of JRAD statute, sentencing court could not recommend against deportation of alien whose criminal conduct occurred prior to repeal
• finding that the law abolishing judicial recommendations against deportation can be applied retroactively to conduct that occurred prior to the change in law
• upholding retroactive repeal of Judicial Recommendations Against Deportation for certain criminal aliens
• “Congress’s retroactive elimination, in the 1990 Act, of a sentencing court’s power to grant relief from the civil penalty of deportation does not increase the criminal penalties and hence does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).