Skip to main content
· 6/15/1846

United States v. Staly

Citations

  • 27 F. Cas. 1290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • If the opposing party does not move to strike the response as untimely, “it waive[s] any objection to its timeliness” and the Superior Comillas discretion to consider the untimely response
  • “Although the Superior Court failed to provide an explanation for considering the defendant’s untimely motion, the record reflects that the People did not move to strike Destin’s motion as being untimely, and therefore it waived any objection to its timeliness”
  • “This Court reviews constitutional claims de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodbury

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.