· 6/15/1846
United States v. Staly
Citations
- 27 F. Cas. 1290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- If the opposing party does not move to strike the response as untimely, “it waive[s] any objection to its timeliness” and the Superior Comillas discretion to consider the untimely response
- “Although the Superior Court failed to provide an explanation for considering the defendant’s untimely motion, the record reflects that the People did not move to strike Destin’s motion as being untimely, and therefore it waived any objection to its timeliness”
- “This Court reviews constitutional claims de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodbury
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.