Skip to main content
· 2/1/2000

United States v. Stacy Weischedel, Opinion

Citations

  • 201 F.3d 1250
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 807
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1253
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1203
  • 2000 WL 108156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the court must consider not only “the characteristics of the defendant’s chosen victim,” but also “the victim’s reaction to the criminal conduct[ ] and the circumstances surrounding the criminal act”
  • stating the vulnerable victim analysis should “focus on the particular vulnerability of the individual victim’s situation, rather than upon attributes common to a large segment of the population”
  • vulnerable victim adjustment is assessed based on “the surrounding circumstances of the crime in addition to the particular characteristics of the victim”
  • “A district court can properly deny a Rule 17(b) subpoena request when the testimony sought would be cumulative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Beezer, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.